Wednesday 23 March 2022

WAITING FOR GODOT

About writer


Samuel Barclay Beckett ( 13 April 1906 – 22 December 1989) was an Irish novelist, playwright, short story writer, theatre director, poet, and literary translator. A resident of Paris for most of his adult life, he wrote in both French and English.



About Waiting for Godot :



Waiting for Godot (/ˈɡɒdoʊ/ GOD-oh)[1] is a play by Samuel Beckett in which two characters, Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo), engage in a variety of discussions and encounters while awaiting the titular Godot, who never arrives.[2] Waiting for Godot is Beckett's translation of his own original French-language play, En attendant Godot, and is subtitled (in English only) "a tragicomedy in two acts". The original French text was composed between 9 October 1948 and 29 January 1949.[4] The premiere, directed by Roger Blin, was on 5 January 1953 at the Théâtre de Babylone Paris. The English-language version Waiting for Godot (/ˈɡɒdoʊ/ GOD-oh)is a play by Samuel Beckett in which two characters, Vladimir (Didi) and Estragon (Gogo), engage in a variety of discussions and encounters while awaiting the titular Godot, who never arrives.Waiting for Godot is Beckett's translation of his own original French-language play, En attendant Godot, and is subtitled (in English only) "a tragicomedy in two acts".The original French text was composed between 9 October 1948 and 29 January 1949.The premiere, directed by Roger Blin, was on 5 January 1953 at the Théâtre de Babylone [fr], Paris. The English-language version premiered in London in 1955. In a poll conducted by the British Royal National Theatre in 1998/99, it was voted the "most significant English language play of the 20th century in London in 1955. In a poll conducted by the British Royal National Theatre in 1998/99, it was voted the "most significant English language play of the 20th century.


 Do you agree that behaviour of lucky  is very irritating and naustic? Even when master pozzo is blind  he obendintely  hands the whip in hand do you think  such a capacity of slavishness  is unbelievable?

Yes, I am agree that behaviour  of lucky is  irritating &naustic very submissive  slave because in the act 1 when the vladimir&estragone both meet him and in that scene Vladimir tries to free the lucky from the pozzo but he is fails to do so. It is an opposite situation than the thought of the audience.As a spector  I thought that luck was very happy  with his freedom but it did not happen. In the first act it can be seen that whatever command Pozzo gave to lucky he followed that command without any objection. If he said think then lucky is starting to think so this is the behaviour of slavishness which can't  believe at all. In the video which is given below is represent the slavishness of lucky.





In the second act it is seen that pozzo became blind and lucky became  mute.it can be called as submissive slavishness of lucky.because as the master of lucky is becoming blind he got a chance to run away from pozzo, but he didn't  to do so.but he help the master to do work that is OK but when the lucky give the whip to his blind  master that come on hit me this can be called a very much slavish behaviour of lucky it can be seen as the submissive slavishness  of lucky.





Tuesday 22 March 2022

BRTHE PLAY:SAMUEL BECKETT

This blog is a response of the shortest play breathe which is by  Samuel backket. In this play there is interpretation and it is part of thinking activity  so Firstly I  want to share summary of the play  brethe.


Breath is a notably short stage work by Samuel Beckett. An altered version was first included in " Kenneth Tynan's revue oh ! Calcutta at the Eden Theatre in New York city on June 16, 1969. Here I attach video of my interpretation





The script of the play:


. Faint light on stage littered with miscellaneous rubbish.  Hold for about five seconds.


2.  Faint brief cry and immediately inspiration and slow increase of light together reaching maximum together in about ten seconds.  Silence and hold about five seconds.


3.  Expiration and slow decrease of light together reaching minimum together (light as in I) in about ten seconds and immediately cry as before.  Silence and hold for about five seconds.


Here I attach  video of my interpretation  of the play

Sunday 13 March 2022

FLIPPED LEARNING TASK

This blog is a response to the thinking activity  on exitalism. Here I have written about what is my learning outcome, what are my thoughts regarding  this topic, what is my favourite  thought of this topic etc.


Existentialism: a philosophical theory or approach which emphasises the existence of the individual person as a free and responsible agent determining their own development through acts of the will.-


Video 1

This video began with the basic introduction of Existentialism and gave three sides of existentialism; freedom, passion and individuality. Existentialism is the theory which came up after war so it came from meaninglessness of life, absurdity. According to Albert Camu one should embrace and understand absurdity rather than start believing in god. Believing is god means escaping from the real situations and leaving everything in god. This is Philosophical suicide. For the first time I came across this out of the box idea, the idea of Philosophical suicide.



Video 2

This video talks about the Myth of Sisyphus- Sisyphus teaches us to never give in to circumstantial disappointments or try to escape from the failures, rather accept failures the same way we accept our achievements. Along with it Absurd reasoning is talking about in relation to suicide. Absurd is illogical, the understanding which I got from this video is when one is feeling low and absurd things of no worth and finds no meaning in life is driven towards suicide. and all this reasoning before suicide in Absurd reasoning. Through the myth of Sisyphus the moral i learnt is to accept what you got like achievements and search for hope.


I like the thought is that one needs to confront problems which are leading one to absurdity . When you confront a problem and try to fight it; there will be the total absence of hope, continuous rejection and dissatisfaction but all this is not equal to despair, renunciation and immature unrest.


Video 3

The video brought me to the realization that after every world war people are so much in despair and in a negative approach towards life that it brings new theories. This video talks briefly about the three theories of Dadaism, nihilism, and existentialism. Dadaism emerged after WW I which questioned every traditional value and tried to destroy its base. It was a quest for change and Existentialism came into existence after WWII which was trying to awaken people and make them understand their own worth and individuality. Video 4 In this video the speakers are discussed about that after every world war people are so much in despair and in a negative approach towards life that it brings new theories. This video talks briefly about the three theories of Dadaism, nihilism, and existentialism. Dadaism emerged after WW I which questioned every traditional value and tried to destroy its base. It was a quest for change and Existentialism came into existence after WWII which was trying to awaken people and make them understand their own worth and individuality.


Video 5

existentialism theory says to be individual and understand yourself which can also be read as ‘self love '. So can it be read similar to narcissist theory.

Video 6

This video explains that Existentialism and Nihilism are not the same things. Every existentialist has fought against nihilism in one or another way.


Video 7

This video gives the difference between Existentialism and Nihilism. It says existentialism is not a psychological system or set of rules, it is a movement.


Video 8

video talks about Eric Dodson’s personal experience being existentialist. He likes existentialism because it appeals to our mind, heart and soul. He shares that if one keeps on looking at things rationally then life takes away the magic of things/ life.








Saturday 12 March 2022

ABOUT ARCHITYPAL CRITICISM

What is archetypal criticism ?

Archetypal literary criticism was given impetus by Maud Bodkin’s Archetypal Patterns in Poetry (1934) and flourished especially during the 1950s and 1960s. Apart from him, the other prominent practitioners of various modes of archetypal criticism were G. Wilson Knight, Robert Graves, Philip Wheelwright, Richard Chase, Leslie Fiedler, and Joseph Campbell. These critics tended to emphasize the occurrence of mythical patterns in literature, on the assumption that myths are closest to the elemental archetype than the artful manipulation of sophisticated writers.


The death/re-birth theme was often said to be the archetype of archetypes, and was held to be grounded in the cycle of the seasons and the organic cycle of human life; this archetype, it was claimed, occur in primitive rituals of the king who is annually sacrificed, in widespread myths of gods who die to be reborn, and in a multitude of diverse texts, including the Bible, Dante’s Divine Comedy in the early 14th cen., and S.T.Coleridge’sRime of Ancient Mariner in 1798.

Among the other archetypal themes, images and characters frequently traced in literature were the journey underground, the heavenly ascent, the search, the Paradise/Hades dichotomy, the Promethean rebel-hero, the scapegoat, the earth goddess, and the fatal woman.There are two methods in archetypal criticism the first is indicative method  and second is deductive here is briefly explained here.



About Deductive method 

The deductive method in some sense resembles the application of a theory to analyze a work of art. It is the process of going from particular to general. Frye explains this method through the examples of music and painting. Just as music some arts move in time whereas others move in space like painting. The 'organizing principle', to put in Frye's words, in both the cases is 'recurrence', which, when it comes to temporal arts is called rhythm and for spacial arts is called pattern. Literature, in Frye's opinion seems to intermediate between the temporal and spatial as it combines the elements of both. The rhythm of literature can be the narrative whereas the pattern can be the simultaneous mental grasp of meaning and significance. The rhythm or narrative in literature is derived from the natural cycle surrounding human life whereas the patterns of imagery or the mental grasp in Frye's opinion are oracular in origin and derive from epiphanic moments. This process ultimately establishes myth as the 'central informing power' which gives archetypal significance to the ritual and archetypal narrative to the oracle. Thus Frye establishes myth as the archetype. This myth constructs a story out of the solar cycle of the day, seasonal cycle of the year and organic cycle of  human life, around a figure who is partly the sun, partly vegetative fertility and partly a God or archetypal human being.


The deductive method provides us the four phases of the myth. Beginning from the birth to the death phase with the natural cycles and symbols associated with it. This also helps Frye to distinguish how these phases are used in the genres of tragedy and comedy.

As Northrop Frye observes that in  music there is a fixed time but in painting there is time. Music is timeless. 

If we observe the painting the painting is seen in only 1 second but in music there is timelessness to learn the music we have to spend time on that while in painting it is not so necessary to give time.


When we do the criticism it is said that pattern music and rhythm of music.



Friday 11 March 2022

THE GREAT GATSBY

About writer 

Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald (September 24, 1896 – December 21, 1940) was an American novelist, essayist, short story writer and screenwriter. He was best known for his novels depicting the flamboyance and excess of the Jazz Age—a term he popularised. During his lifetime, he published four novels, four story collections, and 164 short stories. Although he achieved temporary popular success and fortune in the 1920s, Fitzgerald received critical acclaim only after his death and is now widely regarded as one of the greatest American writers of the 20th century.

About The Great  Gatsby 

The Great Gatsby is a 1925 novel by American writer F. Scott Fitzgerald. Set in the Jazz Age on Long Island, near New York City, the novel depicts first-person narrator Nick Carraway's interactions with mysterious millionaire Jay Gatsby and Gatsby's obsession to reunite with his former lover, Daisy Buchanan.


We had a movie screening  of The Great Gatsby at our department  so as per my understanding of Nick's  character as a narrator  I have written this blog.



Nick carryway as a narrator:When the movie starts there is first character was introduced as narrator and he was nick carraway. He remained as a silent  observer in the whole movie. Even though he also knew about all the characters ' nature and secrets.



 


When the movie began, Nick Carraway  was in the psychopathic clinic. He was quite innocent,  he is also a cousin of Daisy buccan.he is a character who takes the audience 8 years back in 1922. When nick tells us a story the year was 1929. So it is clear that the movie is going with flashback scenes.He addressed Gatsby as a very hopeful person he has not ever seen before.


He Firstly tells that he was a neighbour of Jay Gatsby who was living in the west egg. Nick is living besides the west egg. As the movie goes further, Jay Gatsby  specially invites  Nick Carraway to his party , because Jay  Gatsby knows that Nick is the cousin of daisy. 


After that party  scene Gatsby  and Nick  met again at the house of Gatsby where he  talked about the relationship between Daisy and him but as in the movie showed that Daisy is a woman who loves materialistic  things very much. because of that she got married with Tom, but as our narrator speaks in the very beginning that as Gatsby was a very hopeful  person and this characteristics  also observed  through his character even though Daisy got married Gatsby has hope that she will come back to him.


As a narrator nick seen many characters like Tom,mayor wolfshim,George Willson  and many other character but nick does not say award about that character  even if he observe every single moment of the  characters. The scene of  Tom which represented  violent, cruelty of Tom though the narrator is present in that scene but he didn't  do anything he remain silent. (The scene is given below.)








When the Gatsby told  about relationship of daisy&him though as a  brother and he also knew that daisy is married  he doesn't  take any actions against Gatsby.

 

When the Gatsby speaks that he learned  man from Oxford University nick know the fact that he became rich by the Gambling &wrong doings but as a narrator nick was not released  the dark side of the Gatsby. It is the Tom's  character  who  knows the reality of Gatsby.


In the last sequence  when Gatsby told Tom that daisy loves him and Tom asked about truth at that time nick also knows that daisy  loves Gatsby but she didn't  go with Gatsby though at that time he also remain slient as a narrator. he  does not give any compliments  or any judgment  or any comments to the characters.


In the middle part of the  movie the narrator said that I am within without so it means that nick remain neutral in whole movie he is not judged  any character 




Sunday 6 March 2022

ABOUT POEMS OF AUDEN

About W.H. AUDEN

Wystan Hugh Auden  was born on 21 February 1907 – 29 September 1973 his poetry was noted for its stylistic and technical achievement, its engagement with politics, morals, love, and religion, and its variety in tone, form, and content. Some of his best known poems are about love, such as "Funeral Blues''; on political and social themes, such as "September 1, 1939" and "The Shield of Achilles''; on cultural and psychological themes, such as The Age of Anxiety; and on religious themes such as "For the Time Being" and "Horae Canonicae.

POEM:SEPT 1,1939

sit in one of the dives

On Fifty-second Street

Uncertain and afraid

As the clever hopes expire

Of a low dishonest decade:

Waves of anger and fear

Circulate over the bright

And darkened lands of the earth,

Obsessing our private lives;

The unmentionable odour of death

Offends the September night.


Accurate scholarship can

Unearth the whole offence

From Luther until now

That has driven a culture mad,

Find what occurred at Linz,

What huge imago made

A psychopathic god:

I and the public know

What all schoolchildren learn,

Those to whom evil is done

Do evil in return.


Exiled Thucydides knew

All that a speech can say

About Democracy,

And what dictators do,

The elderly rubbish they talk

To an apathetic grave;

Analysed all in his book,

The enlightenment driven away,

The habit-forming pain,

Mismanagement and grief:

We must suffer them all again.


Into this neutral air

Where blind skyscrapers use

Their full height to proclaim

The strength of Collective Man,

Each language pours its vain

Competitive excuse:

But who can live for long

In an euphoric dream;

Out of the mirror they stare,

Imperialism's face

And the international wrong.


Faces along the bar

Cling to their average day:

The lights must never go out,

The music must always play,

All the conventions conspire

To make this fort assume

The furniture of home;

Lest we should see where we are,

Lost in a haunted wood,

Children afraid of the night

Who have never been happy or good.


The windiest militant trash

Important Persons shout

Is not so crude as our wish:

What mad Nijinsky wrote

About Diaghilev

Is true of the normal heart;

For the error bred in the bone

Of each woman and each man

Craves what it cannot have,

Not universal love

But to be loved alone.


From the conservative dark

Into the ethical life

The dense commuters come,

Repeating their morning vow;

"I will be true to the wife,

I'll concentrate more on my work,"

And helpless governors wake

To resume their compulsory game:

Who can release them now,

Who can reach the deaf,

Who can speak for the dumb?


All I have is a voice

To undo the folded lie,

The romantic lie in the brain

Of the sensual man-in-the-street

And the lie of Authority

Whose buildings grope the sky:

There is no such thing as the State

And no one exists alone;

Hunger allows no choice

To the citizen or the police;

We must love one another or die.


Defenceless under the night

Our world in stupor lies;

Yet, dotted everywhere,

Ironic points of light

Flash out wherever the Just

Exchange their messages:

May I, composed like them

Of Eros and of dust,

Beleaguered by the same

Negation and despair,

Show an affirming flame.


In this poem Sept 1 1939 as the title shows a date so it is extraordinary  that the title of the poem is date. The poem I read as a outbreak  of the  world War 1 as we see today is also similar kind of situation as we read  in the news about war between Russia and Ukraine,  so in this time the poem revisiting by the many readers because  there are similar thing in that time and in present time  also.


If we so in context of war it is to be seen that in that  time the dictator  like hitler who is  democratically  elected  in today's  time we can compare dictator like valmidir  putin  and the Ukraine the dictator  like jablonsky both are elected  democratically.  As the dictator said to his people the people are ready to do anything like when Putin declares a war neither any soldier nor  any people raise a voice against him.


Here the speaker said that it was a dishonest  decade so it is  compared In today's  time also as  we live among the war atmosphere so this time also can be considered dishonest  decade .

Here speaker  also said that it was the time when anger and fear also there so a it Is  seen  in  today's  context  that on the on side there Is angry people of Ukraine  and they were also in fear as jealonsky request putin about they were need of  the treaty  because many innocent ukraine were in fear and also many were in anger as it I shown in below.



As Auden mentioned IN poem that war  obsessed  private lives also so this is same  kind of situation  in now a days so many innocent people are died in this war  war is also affect  to students private lives also as we all know that many students are  trapped among the war atmosphere on the other side it can be argued that in that war of Russia & Ukraine students are very innocent because they all are neither from Russia nor from Ukraine they  all students are from another country so as the poet say war  can disturb life of innocent people.


In the  next stanza there is reference to Martin  Luther  King who was a German professor  of theology. He was known for reformation  in  religion.  Here the poet also used the word LINZ so this word Is a symbol of the birth  place of hitler.


Here poet also used the word thucydides so a thucydides is  a 5th century B.C.athenian  historian who known for his work history of peloponnesian  war which I fought between republican & spa  in the next line speaker says about nature of dictator that the speech of  dictators are never  being right what they say and what they do are quite  paradoxical  thing as it is seen in  the modern  times movie.  From their talk it can be seen that the people of the country must have suffered  all the things again as the people of Russia and Ukraine  are suffering the pain because of their dictators.


Here speaker  said about the neutral air as it is seen in world War 1 that there Is  america Who stay neutral in the atmosphere  of war in the nowadays india was also neutral in the situation of war as Ukraine  request India to interfere in war for the  peace but india remain neutral in this situation, so it can be also argue that India remain neutral it means that India is in side of Russia it is  big question  I nowadays and it can be said as an international  wrong also.In this situation india is also need to come out from individualism also, if you aren't  came out  from  this idea,of individualism  it means it is wrong . Here india is neutral or individual country in the time of war.

This news gave the idea of neutrality of india in this complicated  time.

Here the reference of ninjisky and diglihev. Both have realtions like homosexual  and because of this ninjisky  got mad and wrote a diary so in this way the reference  is connected. Here are paradoxical word of universal love&loved ones. So we are in the category  of selfish  people we are not for universal  love. Here the dictators are the  best examples  who are obsessed with their  self love. In the below news it can be seen that dictators are very selfish because they aren't even affected with the war atmosphere they are only thinking about their self love.

                       Image represents  self love of.                                              dicators


In the next stanza there are all words regarding  selfishness.


In the next stanza the lines

    We must love one another or die.

These lines  referred  to the corona pandemic   that if one should affect that virus the other member is also affected with the same thing. It is also similar with nowadays war atmosphere that if one soldier  dies in war then his family and the country are also affected. 


In the next the speaker or the poet used the word stupor  lies  it means a state of unconscious  mind. Here the poet used Eros and dust which is also a paradoxical  word Eros means life, dust means death.


Conclusion :

As per Auden this poem is so hypocritical.  This poem is  also useful to give people answer of crisis like corona pandamic or world War 3 in short if the crime is against humanity the poem is worth reading 

As we seen I today's context  that war is all about nationality so it can be called as an opium. This image show the nationality in the people

 







African Literature

Name: Hirva Pandya Roll No.: 10 Enrollment No.: 4069206420210022 Paper no: 206 Paper code: 22413 Paper name: African Literature  Sem.: 4 (Ba...